toolchaintechnotes.xml 12 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218
  1. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
  2. <!DOCTYPE sect1 PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.4//EN"
  3. "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd" [
  4. <!ENTITY % general-entities SYSTEM "../general.ent">
  5. %general-entities;
  6. ]>
  7. <sect1 id="ch-tools-toolchaintechnotes">
  8. <?dbhtml filename="toolchaintechnotes.html"?>
  9. <title>Toolchain Technical Notes</title>
  10. <para>This section explains some of the rationale and technical details
  11. behind the overall build method. It is not essential to immediately
  12. understand everything in this section. Most of this information will be
  13. clearer after performing an actual build. This section can be referred
  14. back to at any time during the process.</para>
  15. <para>The overall goal of <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> is to
  16. provide a temporary environment that can be chrooted into and from which can be
  17. produced a clean, trouble-free build of the target LFS system in <xref
  18. linkend="chapter-building-system"/>. Along the way, we separate the new system
  19. from the host system as much as possible, and in doing so, build a
  20. self-contained and self-hosted toolchain. It should be noted that the build
  21. process has been designed to minimize the risks for new readers and provide
  22. maximum educational value at the same time.</para>
  23. <important>
  24. <para>Before continuing, be aware of the name of the working platform,
  25. often referred to as the target triplet. Many times, the target
  26. triplet will probably be <emphasis>i686-pc-linux-gnu</emphasis>. A
  27. simple way to determine the name of the target triplet is to run the
  28. <command>config.guess</command> script that comes with the source for
  29. many packages. Unpack the Binutils sources and run the script:
  30. <userinput>./config.guess</userinput> and note the output.</para>
  31. <para>Also be aware of the name of the platform's dynamic linker, often
  32. referred to as the dynamic loader (not to be confused with the standard
  33. linker <command>ld</command> that is part of Binutils). The dynamic linker
  34. provided by Glibc finds and loads the shared libraries needed by a program,
  35. prepares the program to run, and then runs it. The name of the dynamic
  36. linker will usually be <filename class="libraryfile">ld-linux.so.2</filename>.
  37. On platforms that are less prevalent, the name might be <filename
  38. class="libraryfile">ld.so.1</filename>, and newer 64 bit platforms might
  39. be named something else entirely. The name of the platform's dynamic linker
  40. can be determined by looking in the <filename class="directory">/lib</filename>
  41. directory on the host system. A sure-fire way to determine the name is to
  42. inspect a random binary from the host system by running:
  43. <userinput>readelf -l &lt;name of binary&gt; | grep interpreter</userinput>
  44. and noting the output. The authoritative reference covering all platforms
  45. is in the <filename>shlib-versions</filename> file in the root of the Glibc
  46. source tree.</para>
  47. </important>
  48. <para>Some key technical points of how the <xref
  49. linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> build method works:</para>
  50. <itemizedlist>
  51. <listitem>
  52. <para>The process is similar in principle to cross-compiling, whereby
  53. tools installed in the same prefix work in cooperation, and thus utilize
  54. a little GNU <quote>magic</quote></para>
  55. </listitem>
  56. <listitem>
  57. <para>Careful manipulation of the standard linker's library search path
  58. ensures programs are linked only against chosen libraries</para>
  59. </listitem>
  60. <listitem>
  61. <para>Careful manipulation of <command>gcc</command>'s
  62. <filename>specs</filename> file tells the compiler which target dynamic
  63. linker will be used</para>
  64. </listitem>
  65. </itemizedlist>
  66. <para>Binutils is installed first because the <command>configure</command>
  67. runs of both GCC and Glibc perform various feature tests on the assembler
  68. and linker to determine which software features to enable or disable. This
  69. is more important than one might first realize. An incorrectly configured
  70. GCC or Glibc can result in a subtly broken toolchain, where the impact of
  71. such breakage might not show up until near the end of the build of an
  72. entire distribution. A test suite failure will usually highlight this error
  73. before too much additional work is performed.</para>
  74. <para>Binutils installs its assembler and linker in two locations,
  75. <filename class="directory">/tools/bin</filename> and <filename
  76. class="directory">/tools/$TARGET_TRIPLET/bin</filename>. The tools in one
  77. location are hard linked to the other. An important facet of the linker is
  78. its library search order. Detailed information can be obtained from
  79. <command>ld</command> by passing it the <parameter>--verbose</parameter>
  80. flag. For example, an <userinput>ld --verbose | grep SEARCH</userinput>
  81. will illustrate the current search paths and their order. It shows which
  82. files are linked by <command>ld</command> by compiling a dummy program and
  83. passing the <parameter>--verbose</parameter> switch to the linker. For example,
  84. <userinput>gcc dummy.c -Wl,--verbose 2&gt;&amp;1 | grep succeeded</userinput>
  85. will show all the files successfully opened during the linking.</para>
  86. <para>The next package installed is GCC. An example of what can be
  87. seen during its run of <command>configure</command> is:</para>
  88. <screen><computeroutput>checking what assembler to use...
  89. /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/as
  90. checking what linker to use... /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld</computeroutput></screen>
  91. <para>This is important for the reasons mentioned above. It also demonstrates
  92. that GCC's configure script does not search the PATH directories to find which
  93. tools to use. However, during the actual operation of <command>gcc</command>
  94. itself, the same search paths are not necessarily used. To find out which
  95. standard linker <command>gcc</command> will use, run:
  96. <userinput>gcc -print-prog-name=ld</userinput>.</para>
  97. <para>Detailed information can be obtained from <command>gcc</command> by
  98. passing it the <parameter>-v</parameter> command line option while compiling
  99. a dummy program. For example, <userinput>gcc -v dummy.c</userinput> will show
  100. detailed information about the preprocessor, compilation, and assembly stages,
  101. including <command>gcc</command>'s included search paths and their order.</para>
  102. <para>The next package installed is Glibc. The most important considerations
  103. for building Glibc are the compiler, binary tools, and kernel headers. The
  104. compiler is generally not an issue since Glibc will always use the
  105. <command>gcc</command> found in a <envar>PATH</envar> directory. The binary
  106. tools and kernel headers can be a bit more complicated. Therefore, take no
  107. risks and use the available configure switches to enforce the correct
  108. selections. After the run of <command>configure</command>, check the contents
  109. of the <filename>config.make</filename> file in the <filename
  110. class="directory">glibc-build</filename> directory for all important details.
  111. Note the use of <parameter>CC="gcc -B/tools/bin/"</parameter> to control which
  112. binary tools are used and the use of the <parameter>-nostdinc</parameter>
  113. and <parameter>-isystem</parameter> flags to control the compiler's include
  114. search path. These items highlight an important aspect of the Glibc
  115. package&mdash;it is very self-sufficient in terms of its build machinery and
  116. generally does not rely on toolchain defaults.</para>
  117. <para>After the Glibc installation, make some adjustments to ensure that
  118. searching and linking take place only within the <filename
  119. class="directory">/tools</filename> prefix. Install an adjusted
  120. <command>ld</command>, which has a hard-wired search path limited to
  121. <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>. Then amend
  122. <command>gcc</command>'s specs file to point to the new dynamic linker in
  123. <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>. This last step is vital
  124. to the whole process. As mentioned above, a hard-wired path to a dynamic
  125. linker is embedded into every Executable and Link Format (ELF)-shared
  126. executable. This can be inspected by running:
  127. <userinput>readelf -l &lt;name of binary&gt; | grep interpreter</userinput>.
  128. Amending gcc's specs file ensures that every program compiled from here
  129. through the end of this chapter will use the new dynamic linker in
  130. <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>.</para>
  131. <para>The need to use the new dynamic linker is also the reason why
  132. the Specs patch is applied for the second pass of GCC. Failure to do
  133. so will result in the GCC programs themselves having the name of the
  134. dynamic linker from the host system's <filename
  135. class="directory">/lib</filename> directory embedded into them, which
  136. would defeat the goal of getting away from the host.</para>
  137. <para>During the second pass of Binutils, we are able to utilize the
  138. <parameter>--with-lib-path</parameter> configure switch to control
  139. <command>ld</command>'s library search path. From this point onwards,
  140. the core toolchain is self-contained and self-hosted. The remainder of
  141. the <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> packages all build against
  142. the new Glibc in <filename class="directory">/tools</filename>.</para>
  143. <para>Upon entering the chroot environment in <xref
  144. linkend="chapter-building-system"/>, the first major package to be
  145. installed is Glibc, due to its self-sufficient nature mentioned above.
  146. Once this Glibc is installed into <filename
  147. class="directory">/usr</filename>, perform a quick changeover of the
  148. toolchain defaults, then proceed in building the rest of the target
  149. LFS system.</para>
  150. <!-- FIXME: Removed as part of the fix for bug 1061 - we no longer build pass1
  151. packages statically, therefore this explanation isn't required
  152. <sect2>
  153. <title>Notes on Static Linking</title>
  154. <para>Besides their specific task, most programs have to perform many
  155. common and sometimes trivial operations. These include allocating
  156. memory, searching directories, reading and writing files, string
  157. handling, pattern matching, arithmetic, and other tasks. Instead of
  158. obliging each program to reinvent the wheel, the GNU system provides
  159. all these basic functions in ready-made libraries. The major library
  160. on any Linux system is Glibc.</para>
  161. <para>There are two primary ways of linking the functions from a
  162. library to a program that uses them&mdash;statically or dynamically. When
  163. a program is linked statically, the code of the used functions is
  164. included in the executable, resulting in a rather bulky program. When
  165. a program is dynamically linked, it includes a reference to the
  166. dynamic linker, the name of the library, and the name of the function,
  167. resulting in a much smaller executable. A third option is to use the
  168. programming interface of the dynamic linker (see <filename>dlopen(3)</filename>
  169. for more information).</para>
  170. <para>Dynamic linking is the default on Linux and has three major
  171. advantages over static linking. First, only one copy of the executable
  172. library code is needed on the hard disk, instead of having multiple
  173. copies of the same code included in several programs, thus saving
  174. disk space. Second, when several programs use the same library
  175. function at the same time, only one copy of the function's code is
  176. required in core, thus saving memory space. Third, when a library
  177. function gets a bug fixed or is otherwise improved, only the one
  178. library needs to be recompiled instead of recompiling all programs
  179. that make use of the improved function.</para>
  180. <para>If dynamic linking has several advantages, why then do we
  181. statically link the first two packages in this chapter? The reasons
  182. are threefold&mdash;historical, educational, and technical. The
  183. historical reason is that earlier versions of LFS statically linked
  184. every program in this chapter. Educationally, knowing the difference
  185. between static and dynamic linking is useful. The technical benefit is
  186. a gained element of independence from the host, meaning that those
  187. programs can be used independently of the host system. However, it is
  188. worth noting that an overall successful LFS build can still be
  189. achieved when the first two packages are built dynamically.</para>
  190. </sect2>-->
  191. </sect1>