|
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ are able to resolve the issue. You can consult the LFS Wiki at
|
|
get PTYs working.</para>
|
|
get PTYs working.</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<note><para>It's worth pointing out that the GCC test suite we run in this
|
|
<note><para>It's worth pointing out that the GCC test suite we run in this
|
|
-section is considered not as critical as the one we run in Chapter 6.</para></note>
|
|
|
|
|
|
+section is considered not as important as the one we run in Chapter 6.</para></note>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>Unpack all three GCC tarballs (-core, -g++, and -testsuite) in one and the same working directory.
|
|
<para>Unpack all three GCC tarballs (-core, -g++, and -testsuite) in one and the same working directory.
|
|
They will all unfold into a single <filename>gcc-&gcc-version;/</filename>
|
|
They will all unfold into a single <filename>gcc-&gcc-version;/</filename>
|
|
@@ -77,9 +77,15 @@ variables that override the default optimization flags.</para>
|
|
<para>Compile the package:</para>
|
|
<para>Compile the package:</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para><screen><userinput>make</userinput></screen></para>
|
|
<para><screen><userinput>make</userinput></screen></para>
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
<para>There is no need to use the <userinput>bootstrap</userinput> target now,
|
|
<para>There is no need to use the <userinput>bootstrap</userinput> target now,
|
|
-as the compiler we're using to compile this GCC has been built from the exact
|
|
|
|
-same sources.</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
+as the compiler we're using to compile this GCC was built from the exact same
|
|
|
|
+version of the GCC sources we used earlier.</para>
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+<note><para>At this point it is strongly recommended to repeat the sanity check
|
|
|
|
+we performed earlier in the chapter. Refer back to the "Locking in" Glibc section
|
|
|
|
+and repeat the check. If the results are wrong then most likely, you forgot to
|
|
|
|
+apply the abovementioned GCC Specs patch.</para></note>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>Test the results:</para>
|
|
<para>Test the results:</para>
|
|
|
|
|