toolchaintechnotes.xml 12 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219
  1. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
  2. <!DOCTYPE sect1 PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.5//EN"
  3. "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.5/docbookx.dtd" [
  4. <!ENTITY % general-entities SYSTEM "../general.ent">
  5. %general-entities;
  6. ]>
  7. <sect1 id="ch-tools-toolchaintechnotes">
  8. <?dbhtml filename="toolchaintechnotes.html"?>
  9. <title>Toolchain Technical Notes</title>
  10. <para>This section explains some of the rationale and technical details
  11. behind the overall build method. It is not essential to immediately
  12. understand everything in this section. Most of this information will be
  13. clearer after performing an actual build. This section can be referred
  14. to at any time during the process.</para>
  15. <para>The overall goal of <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> is to
  16. provide a temporary environment that can be chrooted into,
  17. where a clean, trouble-free build of the target LFS system in <xref
  18. linkend="chapter-building-system"/> can be produced. Along the way, we
  19. separate the new system from the host system as much as possible, and in
  20. doing so, build a self-contained and self-hosted toolchain.
  21. The build process has been designed to minimize the risks for new
  22. readers and to provide the most educational value at the same time.</para>
  23. <important>
  24. <para>Before continuing, be aware of the name of the working platform,
  25. often referred to as the target triplet. A simple way to determine the
  26. name of the target triplet is to run the <command>config.guess</command>
  27. script that comes with the source for many packages. Unpack the Binutils
  28. sources and run the script: <userinput>./config.guess</userinput> and note
  29. the output. For example, for a modern 32-bit Intel processor the
  30. output will likely be <emphasis>i686-pc-linux-gnu</emphasis>.</para>
  31. <para>Also be aware of the name of the platform's dynamic linker, often
  32. referred to as the dynamic loader (not to be confused with the standard
  33. linker <command>ld</command> that is part of Binutils). The dynamic linker
  34. provided by Glibc finds and loads the shared libraries needed by a program,
  35. prepares the program to run, and then runs it. The name of the dynamic
  36. linker for a 32-bit Intel machine will be
  37. <filename class="libraryfile">ld-linux.so.2</filename>.
  38. A sure-fire way to determine the name of the dynamic linker is to
  39. inspect a random binary from the host system by running:
  40. <userinput>readelf -l &lt;name of binary&gt; | grep interpreter</userinput>
  41. and noting the output. The authoritative reference covering all platforms
  42. is in the <filename>shlib-versions</filename> file in the root of the Glibc
  43. source tree.</para>
  44. </important>
  45. <para>Some key technical points of how the <xref
  46. linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> build method works:</para>
  47. <itemizedlist>
  48. <listitem>
  49. <para>Slightly adjusting the name of the working platform, by changing the
  50. &quot;vendor&quot; field target triplet by way of the
  51. <envar>LFS_TGT</envar> variable, ensures that the first build of Binutils
  52. and GCC produces a compatible cross-linker and cross-compiler. Instead of
  53. producing binaries for another architecture, the cross-linker and
  54. cross-compiler will produce binaries compatible with the current
  55. hardware.</para>
  56. </listitem>
  57. <listitem>
  58. <para>The temporary libraries are cross-compiled. This removes all
  59. dependency on the host system, lessens the chance of headers or libraries
  60. from the host corrupting the new tools and allows for the possibility of
  61. building both 32-bit and 64-bit libraries on 64-bit capable hardware.</para>
  62. </listitem>
  63. <listitem>
  64. <para>Careful manipulation of <command>gcc</command>'s
  65. <filename>specs</filename> file tells the compiler which target dynamic
  66. linker will be used</para>
  67. </listitem>
  68. </itemizedlist>
  69. <para>Binutils is installed first because the <command>configure</command>
  70. runs of both GCC and Glibc perform various feature tests on the assembler
  71. and linker to determine which software features to enable or disable. This
  72. is more important than one might first realize. An incorrectly configured
  73. GCC or Glibc can result in a subtly broken toolchain, where the impact of
  74. such breakage might not show up until near the end of the build of an
  75. entire distribution. A test suite failure will usually highlight this error
  76. before too much additional work is performed.</para>
  77. <para>Binutils installs its assembler and linker in two locations,
  78. <filename class="directory">/tools/bin</filename> and <filename
  79. class="directory">/tools/$LFS_TGT/bin</filename>. The tools in one
  80. location are hard linked to the other. An important facet of the linker is
  81. its library search order. Detailed information can be obtained from
  82. <command>ld</command> by passing it the <parameter>--verbose</parameter>
  83. flag. For example, an <userinput>ld --verbose | grep SEARCH</userinput>
  84. will illustrate the current search paths and their order. It shows which
  85. files are linked by <command>ld</command> by compiling a dummy program and
  86. passing the <parameter>--verbose</parameter> switch to the linker. For example,
  87. <userinput>gcc dummy.c -Wl,--verbose 2&gt;&amp;1 | grep succeeded</userinput>
  88. will show all the files successfully opened during the linking.</para>
  89. <para>The next package installed is GCC. An example of what can be
  90. seen during its run of <command>configure</command> is:</para>
  91. <screen><computeroutput>checking what assembler to use... /tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/as
  92. checking what linker to use... /tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld</computeroutput></screen>
  93. <para>This is important for the reasons mentioned above. It also demonstrates
  94. that GCC's configure script does not search the PATH directories to find which
  95. tools to use. However, during the actual operation of <command>gcc</command>
  96. itself, the same search paths are not necessarily used. To find out which
  97. standard linker <command>gcc</command> will use, run:
  98. <userinput>gcc -print-prog-name=ld</userinput>.</para>
  99. <para>Detailed information can be obtained from <command>gcc</command> by
  100. passing it the <parameter>-v</parameter> command line option while compiling
  101. a dummy program. For example, <userinput>gcc -v dummy.c</userinput> will show
  102. detailed information about the preprocessor, compilation, and assembly stages,
  103. including <command>gcc</command>'s included search paths and their order.</para>
  104. <para>The next package installed is Glibc. The most important considerations
  105. for building Glibc are the compiler, binary tools, and kernel headers. The
  106. compiler is generally not an issue since Glibc will always use the compiler
  107. relating to the <parameter>--host</parameter> parameter passed to its
  108. configure script, e.g. in our case,
  109. <command>i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc</command>. The binary tools and kernel
  110. headers can be a bit more complicated. Therefore, take no risks and use the
  111. available configure switches to enforce the correct selections. After the run
  112. of <command>configure</command>, check the contents of the
  113. <filename>config.make</filename> file in the <filename
  114. class="directory">glibc-build</filename> directory for all important details.
  115. Note the use of <parameter>CC="i686-lfs-gnu-gcc"</parameter> to control which
  116. binary tools are used and the use of the <parameter>-nostdinc</parameter> and
  117. <parameter>-isystem</parameter> flags to control the compiler's include
  118. search path. These items highlight an important aspect of the Glibc
  119. package&mdash;it is very self-sufficient in terms of its build machinery and
  120. generally does not rely on toolchain defaults.</para>
  121. <para>After the Glibc installation, change <command>gcc</command>'s specs file
  122. to point to the new dynamic linker in <filename
  123. class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>. This last step is vital in ensuring
  124. that searching and linking take place only within the <filename
  125. class="directory">/tools</filename> prefix. A hard-wired
  126. path to a dynamic linker is embedded into every Executable and Link Format
  127. (ELF)-shared executable. This can be inspected by running:
  128. <userinput>readelf -l &lt;name of binary&gt; | grep interpreter</userinput>.
  129. Amending <command>gcc</command>'s specs file ensures that every program
  130. compiled from here through the end of this chapter will use the new dynamic
  131. linker in <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>.</para>
  132. <para>For the second pass of GCC, its sources also need to be modified
  133. to tell GCC to use the new dynamic linker. Failure to do
  134. so will result in the GCC programs themselves having the name of the
  135. dynamic linker from the host system's <filename
  136. class="directory">/lib</filename> directory embedded into them, which
  137. would defeat the goal of getting away from the host.</para>
  138. <para>During the second pass of Binutils, we are able to utilize the
  139. <parameter>--with-lib-path</parameter> configure switch to control
  140. <command>ld</command>'s library search path. From this point onwards,
  141. the core toolchain is self-contained and self-hosted. The remainder of
  142. the <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> packages all build against
  143. the new Glibc in <filename class="directory">/tools</filename>.</para>
  144. <para>Upon entering the chroot environment in <xref
  145. linkend="chapter-building-system"/>, the first major package to be
  146. installed is Glibc, due to its self-sufficient nature mentioned above.
  147. Once this Glibc is installed into <filename
  148. class="directory">/usr</filename>, we will perform a quick changeover of the
  149. toolchain defaults, and then proceed in building the rest of the target
  150. LFS system.</para>
  151. <!-- FIXME: Removed as part of the fix for bug 1061 - we no longer build pass1
  152. packages statically, therefore this explanation isn't required
  153. <sect2>
  154. <title>Notes on Static Linking</title>
  155. <para>Besides their specific task, most programs have to perform many
  156. common and sometimes trivial operations. These include allocating
  157. memory, searching directories, reading and writing files, string
  158. handling, pattern matching, arithmetic, and other tasks. Instead of
  159. obliging each program to reinvent the wheel, the GNU system provides
  160. all these basic functions in ready-made libraries. The major library
  161. on any Linux system is Glibc.</para>
  162. <para>There are two primary ways of linking the functions from a
  163. library to a program that uses them&mdash;statically or dynamically. When
  164. a program is linked statically, the code of the used functions is
  165. included in the executable, resulting in a rather bulky program. When
  166. a program is dynamically linked, it includes a reference to the
  167. dynamic linker, the name of the library, and the name of the function,
  168. resulting in a much smaller executable. A third option is to use the
  169. programming interface of the dynamic linker (see <filename>dlopen(3)</filename>
  170. for more information).</para>
  171. <para>Dynamic linking is the default on Linux and has three major
  172. advantages over static linking. First, only one copy of the executable
  173. library code is needed on the hard disk, instead of having multiple
  174. copies of the same code included in several programs, thus saving
  175. disk space. Second, when several programs use the same library
  176. function at the same time, only one copy of the function's code is
  177. required in core, thus saving memory space. Third, when a library
  178. function gets a bug fixed or is otherwise improved, only the one
  179. library needs to be recompiled instead of recompiling all programs
  180. that make use of the improved function.</para>
  181. <para>If dynamic linking has several advantages, why then do we
  182. statically link the first two packages in this chapter? The reasons
  183. are threefold&mdash;historical, educational, and technical. The
  184. historical reason is that earlier versions of LFS statically linked
  185. every program in this chapter. Educationally, knowing the difference
  186. between static and dynamic linking is useful. The technical benefit is
  187. a gained element of independence from the host, meaning that those
  188. programs can be used independently of the host system. However, it is
  189. worth noting that an overall successful LFS build can still be
  190. achieved when the first two packages are built dynamically.</para>
  191. </sect2>-->
  192. </sect1>