123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161 |
- <sect2><title> </title><para> </para></sect2>
- <sect2>
- <title>Re-installation of GCC</title>
- <para>The tools required to test GCC and Binutils are installed now (Tcl, Expect
- and DejaGnu). We can continue on rebuilding GCC and Binutils, link them against
- the new Glibc, and test them properly. One thing to note, however, is that these
- test suites are highly dependent on properly functioning pseudo terminals (PTYs)
- which are provided by your host distribution. These days, PTYs are most commonly
- implemented via the <emphasis>devpts</emphasis> file system. You can quickly
- check if your host system is set up correctly in this regard by performing a
- simple test:</para>
- <para><screen><userinput>expect -c "spawn ls"</userinput></screen></para>
- <para>If you receive the message:</para>
- <blockquote><screen>The system has no more ptys. Ask your system administrator to create more.</screen></blockquote>
- <para>Your host distribution is not set up for proper PTY operation. In this
- case there is no point in running the test suites for GCC and Binutils until you
- are able to resolve the issue. You can consult the LFS Wiki at
- <ulink url="http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/"/> for more information on how to
- get PTYs working.</para>
- <note><para>It's worth pointing out that the GCC test suite we run in this
- section is considered not as important as the one we run in Chapter 6.</para></note>
- <para>Unpack all three GCC tarballs (-core, -g++, and -testsuite) in one and the
- same working directory. They will all unfold into a single
- <filename>gcc-&gcc-version;/</filename> subdirectory.</para>
- <para>First correct one problem and make an essential adjustment:</para>
- <para><screen><userinput>patch -Np1 -i ../gcc-&gcc-nofixincludes-patch-version;.patch
- patch -Np1 -i ../gcc-&gcc-specs-patch-version;.patch</userinput></screen></para>
- <para>The first patch disables the GCC "fixincludes" script. We mentioned this
- briefly earlier, but a slightly more in-depth explanation of the fixincludes
- process is warranted here. Under normal circumstances, the GCC fixincludes
- script scans your system for header files that need to be fixed. It might find
- that some Glibc header files on your host system need to be fixed, fix them and
- put them in the GCC private include directory. Then, later on in Chapter 6,
- after we've installed the newer Glibc, this private include directory would be
- searched before the system include directory, resulting in GCC finding the
- fixed headers from the host system, which would most likely not match the Glibc
- version actually used for the LFS system.</para>
- <para>The last patch changes GCC's default location of the dynamic linker
- (typically <filename>ld-linux.so.2</filename>). It also removes
- <filename class="directory">/usr/include</filename> from GCC's include search
- path. Patching now rather than adjusting the specs file after installation
- ensures that our new dynamic linker gets used during the actual build of GCC.
- That is, all the final (and temporary) binaries created during the build will
- link against the new Glibc.</para>
- <important><para>These patches are <emphasis>critical</emphasis> in ensuring a
- successful overall build. Do not forget to apply them.</para></important>
- <para>Create a separate build directory again:</para>
- <para><screen><userinput>mkdir ../gcc-build
- cd ../gcc-build</userinput></screen></para>
- <para>Before starting to build GCC, remember to unset any environment
- variables that override the default optimization flags.</para>
- <para>Now prepare GCC to be compiled:</para>
- <para><screen><userinput>../gcc-&gcc-version;/configure --prefix=/tools \
- --with-local-prefix=/tools \
- --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-shared \
- --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit \
- --enable-languages=c,c++</userinput></screen></para>
- <para>The meaning of the new configure options:</para>
- <itemizedlist>
- <listitem><para><userinput>--enable-threads=posix</userinput>: This enables
- C++ exception handling for multi-threaded code.</para></listitem>
- <listitem><para><userinput>--enable-__cxa_atexit</userinput>: This option
- allows use of __cxa_atexit, rather than atexit, to register C++ destructors for
- local statics and global objects and is essential for fully standards-compliant
- handling of destructors. It also affects the C++ ABI and therefore results in
- C++ shared libraries and C++ programs that are interoperable with other Linux
- distributions.</para></listitem>
- <listitem><para><userinput>--enable-clocale=gnu</userinput>: This option ensures
- the correct locale model is selected for the C++ libraries under all
- circumstances. If the configure script finds the <emphasis>de_DE</emphasis>
- locale installed, it will select the correct model of <emphasis>gnu</emphasis>.
- However, people who don't install the <emphasis>de_DE</emphasis> locale, run the
- risk of building ABI incompatible C++ libraries due to the wrong locale model of
- <emphasis>generic</emphasis> being selected.</para></listitem>
- <listitem><para><userinput>--enable-languages=c,c++</userinput>: This option is
- needed to ensure that both C and C++ compilers are built.</para></listitem>
- </itemizedlist>
- <para>Compile the package:</para>
- <para><screen><userinput>make</userinput></screen></para>
- <para>There is no need to use the <userinput>bootstrap</userinput> target now,
- as the compiler we're using to compile this GCC was built from the exact same
- version of the GCC sources we used earlier.</para>
- <note><para>At this point it is strongly recommended to repeat the sanity check
- we performed earlier in the chapter. Refer back to the "Locking in" Glibc section
- and repeat the check. If the results are wrong then most likely, you forgot to
- apply the abovementioned GCC Specs patch.</para></note>
- <para>Test the results:</para>
- <para><screen><userinput>make -k check</userinput></screen></para>
- <para>The <userinput>-k</userinput> flag is used to make the test suite run
- through to completion and not stop at the first failure. The GCC test suite is
- very comprehensive and is almost guaranteed to generate a few failures. To get
- a summary of the test suite results, run this:</para>
-
- <para><screen><userinput>../gcc-&gcc-version;/contrib/test_summary | less</userinput></screen></para>
- <para>You can compare your results to those posted to the gcc-testresults
- mailing list for similar configurations to your own. For an example of how
- current GCC-3.3.1 should look on i686-pc-linux-gnu, see
- <ulink url="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-08/msg01612.html"/>.</para>
- <para>Note that the results contain:</para>
- <screen>* 1 XPASS (unexpected pass) for g++
- * 1 FAIL (unexpected failure) for g++
- * 2 FAIL for gcc
- * 26 XPASS's for libstdc++</screen>
-
- <para>The unexpected pass for g++ is due to the use of
- <userinput>--enable-__cxa_atexit</userinput>. Apparently not all platforms
- supported by GCC have support for "__cxa_atexit" in their C libraries, so this
- test is not always expected to pass.</para>
- <para>The 26 unexpected passes for libstdc++ are due to the use of
- <userinput>--enable-clocale=gnu</userinput>, which is the correct choice on
- Glibc-based systems of versions 2.2.5 and above. The underlying locale support
- in the GNU C library is superior to that of the otherwise selected "generic"
- model (which may be applicable if for instance you were using Newlibc, Sun-libc
- or whatever libc). The libstdc++ test suite is apparently expecting the
- "generic" model, hence those tests are not always expected to pass.</para>
- <para>Unexpected failures often cannot be avoided. The GCC developers are
- usually aware of them but haven't yet gotten around to fixing them. In short,
- unless your results are vastly different from those at the above URL, it is safe
- to continue on.</para>
- <para>And finally install the package:</para>
- <para><screen><userinput>make install</userinput></screen></para>
- </sect2>
|