adjustingtoolchain.xml 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273
  1. <sect1 id="ch06-adjustingtoolchain">
  2. <title>Re-adjusting the toolchain</title>
  3. <?dbhtml filename="adjustingtoolchain.html" dir="chapter06"?>
  4. <para>Now that the new C libraries have been installed, it's time to re-adjust
  5. our toolchain. We'll adjust it so that it will link any newly compiled program
  6. against the new C libraries. Basically, this is the reverse of what we did
  7. in the "Locking in" stage in the beginning of the previous chapter.</para>
  8. <para>The first thing to do is to adjust the linker. For this we retained the
  9. source and build directories from the second pass over Binutils. Install the
  10. adjusted linker by running the following from within the
  11. <filename class="directory">binutils-build</filename> directory:</para>
  12. <para><screen><userinput>make -C ld INSTALL=/tools/bin/install install</userinput></screen></para>
  13. <para>From now on every compiled program will link <emphasis>only</emphasis>
  14. against the libraries in <filename>/usr/lib</filename> and
  15. <filename>/lib</filename>. The extra
  16. <userinput>INSTALL=/tools/bin/install</userinput> is needed because the Makefile
  17. created during the second pass still contains the reference to
  18. <filename>/usr/bin/install</filename>, which we obviously haven't installed yet.
  19. Some host distributions contain a <filename class="symlink">ginstall</filename>
  20. symbolic link which takes precedence in the Makefile and thus can cause a
  21. problem here. The above command takes care of this also.</para>
  22. <para>You can now remove the Binutils source and build directories.</para>
  23. <para>The next thing to do is to amend our GCC specs file so that it points
  24. to the new dynamic linker. Just like earlier on, we use a sed to accomplish
  25. this:</para>
  26. <para><screen><userinput>SPECFILE=/tools/lib/gcc-lib/*/*/specs
  27. sed -e 's@/tools/lib/ld.so.1@/lib/ld.so.1@g' \
  28. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;-e 's@/tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2@/lib/ld-linux.so.2@g' \
  29. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;$SPECFILE > newspecfile
  30. mv newspecfile $SPECFILE
  31. unset SPECFILE</userinput></screen></para>
  32. <para>Again, cutting and pasting the above is recommended. And just like
  33. before, it is a good idea to check the specs file to ensure the intended
  34. changes were actually made.</para>
  35. <caution><para>It is imperative at this point to stop and ensure that the
  36. basic functions (compiling and linking) of the adjusted toolchain are working
  37. as expected. For this we are going to perform a simple sanity check:</para>
  38. <para><screen><userinput>echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
  39. gcc dummy.c
  40. readelf -l a.out | grep ': /lib'</userinput></screen></para>
  41. <para>If everything is working correctly, there should be no errors, and the
  42. output of the last command will be:</para>
  43. <blockquote><screen>[Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux.so.2]</screen></blockquote>
  44. <para>If you did not receive the output as shown above, then something is
  45. seriously wrong. You will need to investigate and retrace your steps to find
  46. out where the problem is and correct it. There is no point in continuing
  47. until this is done. Most likely something went wrong with the specs file
  48. amendment above. Note especially that <filename>/lib</filename> now appears as
  49. the prefix of our dynamic linker. Of course, if you are working on a platform
  50. where the name of the dynamic linker is something other than
  51. <filename>ld-linux.so.2</filename>, then the output will be slightly
  52. different.</para>
  53. <para>Once you are satisfied that all is well, clean up the test files:</para>
  54. <para><screen><userinput>rm dummy.c a.out</userinput></screen></para>
  55. </caution>
  56. </sect1>