| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218 | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><!DOCTYPE sect1 PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.5//EN"  "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.5/docbookx.dtd" [  <!ENTITY % general-entities SYSTEM "../general.ent">  %general-entities;]><sect1 id="ch-tools-toolchaintechnotes">  <?dbhtml filename="toolchaintechnotes.html"?>  <title>Toolchain Technical Notes</title>  <para>This section explains some of the rationale and technical details  behind the overall build method. It is not essential to immediately  understand everything in this section. Most of this information will be  clearer after performing an actual build. This section can be referred  to at any time during the process.</para>  <para>The overall goal of <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> is to  produce a temporary area that contains a known-good set of tools that can be  isolated from the host system. By using <command>chroot</command>, the  commands in the remaining chapters will be contained within that environment,  ensuring a clean, trouble-free build of the target LFS system. The build  process has been designed to minimize the risks for new readers and to provide  the most educational value at the same time.</para>  <important>    <para>Before continuing, be aware of the name of the working platform,    often referred to as the target triplet. A simple way to determine the    name of the target triplet is to run the <command>config.guess</command>    script that comes with the source for many packages. Unpack the Binutils    sources and run the script: <userinput>./config.guess</userinput> and note    the output. For example, for a modern 32-bit Intel processor the    output will likely be <emphasis>i686-pc-linux-gnu</emphasis>.</para>    <para>Also be aware of the name of the platform's dynamic linker, often    referred to as the dynamic loader (not to be confused with the standard    linker <command>ld</command> that is part of Binutils). The dynamic linker    provided by Glibc finds and loads the shared libraries needed by a program,    prepares the program to run, and then runs it. The name of the dynamic    linker for a 32-bit Intel machine will be    <filename class="libraryfile">ld-linux.so.2</filename>.    A sure-fire way to determine the name of the dynamic linker is to    inspect a random binary from the host system by running:    <userinput>readelf -l <name of binary> | grep interpreter</userinput>    and noting the output. The authoritative reference covering all platforms    is in the <filename>shlib-versions</filename> file in the root of the Glibc    source tree.</para>  </important>  <para>Some key technical points of how the <xref  linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> build method works:</para>  <itemizedlist>    <listitem>      <para>Slightly adjusting the name of the working platform, by changing the      "vendor" field target triplet by way of the      <envar>LFS_TGT</envar> variable, ensures that the first build of Binutils      and GCC produces a compatible cross-linker and cross-compiler. Instead of      producing binaries for another architecture, the cross-linker and      cross-compiler will produce binaries compatible with the current      hardware.</para>    </listitem>    <listitem>      <para>The temporary libraries are cross-compiled. This removes all      dependency on the host system, lessens the chance of headers or libraries      from the host corrupting the new tools and allows for the possibility of      building both 32-bit and 64-bit libraries on 64-bit capable hardware.</para>    </listitem>    <listitem>      <para>Careful manipulation of <command>gcc</command>'s      <filename>specs</filename> file tells the compiler which target dynamic      linker will be used</para>    </listitem>  </itemizedlist>  <para>Binutils is installed first because the <command>configure</command>  runs of both GCC and Glibc perform various feature tests on the assembler  and linker to determine which software features to enable or disable. This  is more important than one might first realize. An incorrectly configured  GCC or Glibc can result in a subtly broken toolchain, where the impact of  such breakage might not show up until near the end of the build of an  entire distribution. A test suite failure will usually highlight this error  before too much additional work is performed.</para>  <para>Binutils installs its assembler and linker in two locations,  <filename class="directory">/tools/bin</filename> and <filename  class="directory">/tools/$LFS_TGT/bin</filename>. The tools in one  location are hard linked to the other. An important facet of the linker is  its library search order. Detailed information can be obtained from  <command>ld</command> by passing it the <parameter>--verbose</parameter>  flag. For example, an <userinput>ld --verbose | grep SEARCH</userinput>  will illustrate the current search paths and their order. It shows which  files are linked by <command>ld</command> by compiling a dummy program and  passing the <parameter>--verbose</parameter> switch to the linker. For example,  <userinput>gcc dummy.c -Wl,--verbose 2>&1 | grep succeeded</userinput>  will show all the files successfully opened during the linking.</para>  <para>The next package installed is GCC. An example of what can be  seen during its run of <command>configure</command> is:</para><screen><computeroutput>checking what assembler to use... /tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/aschecking what linker to use... /tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld</computeroutput></screen>  <para>This is important for the reasons mentioned above. It also demonstrates  that GCC's configure script does not search the PATH directories to find which  tools to use. However, during the actual operation of <command>gcc</command>  itself, the same search paths are not necessarily used. To find out which  standard linker <command>gcc</command> will use, run:  <userinput>gcc -print-prog-name=ld</userinput>.</para>  <para>Detailed information can be obtained from <command>gcc</command> by  passing it the <parameter>-v</parameter> command line option while compiling  a dummy program. For example, <userinput>gcc -v dummy.c</userinput> will show  detailed information about the preprocessor, compilation, and assembly stages,  including <command>gcc</command>'s included search paths and their order.</para>  <para>The next package installed is Glibc. The most important considerations  for building Glibc are the compiler, binary tools, and kernel headers. The  compiler is generally not an issue since Glibc will always use the compiler  relating to the <parameter>--host</parameter> parameter passed to its  configure script, e.g. in our case,  <command>i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc</command>. The binary tools and kernel  headers can be a bit more complicated. Therefore, take no risks and use the  available configure switches to enforce the correct selections. After the run  of <command>configure</command>, check the contents of the  <filename>config.make</filename> file in the <filename  class="directory">glibc-build</filename> directory for all important details.  Note the use of <parameter>CC="i686-lfs-gnu-gcc"</parameter> to control which  binary tools are used and the use of the <parameter>-nostdinc</parameter> and  <parameter>-isystem</parameter> flags to control the compiler's include  search path. These items highlight an important aspect of the Glibc  package—it is very self-sufficient in terms of its build machinery and  generally does not rely on toolchain defaults.</para>  <para>After the Glibc installation, change <command>gcc</command>'s specs file  to point to the new dynamic linker in <filename  class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>.  This last step is vital in ensuring  that searching and linking take place only within the <filename  class="directory">/tools</filename> prefix. A hard-wired  path to a dynamic linker is embedded into every Executable and Link Format  (ELF)-shared executable.  This can be inspected by running:  <userinput>readelf -l <name of binary> | grep interpreter</userinput>.  Amending <command>gcc</command>'s specs file ensures that every program  compiled from here through the end of this chapter will use the new dynamic  linker in <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>.</para>  <para>For the second pass of GCC, its sources also need to be modified  to tell GCC to use the new dynamic linker. Failure to do  so will result in the GCC programs themselves having the name of the  dynamic linker from the host system's <filename  class="directory">/lib</filename> directory embedded into them, which  would defeat the goal of getting away from the host.</para>  <para>During the second pass of Binutils, we are able to utilize the  <parameter>--with-lib-path</parameter> configure switch to control  <command>ld</command>'s library search path.  From this point onwards,  the core toolchain is self-contained and self-hosted. The remainder of  the <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> packages all build against  the new Glibc in <filename class="directory">/tools</filename>.</para>  <para>Upon entering the chroot environment in <xref  linkend="chapter-building-system"/>, the first major package to be  installed is Glibc, due to its self-sufficient nature mentioned above.  Once this Glibc is installed into <filename  class="directory">/usr</filename>, we will perform a quick changeover of the  toolchain defaults, and then proceed in building the rest of the target  LFS system.</para>  <!-- FIXME: Removed as part of the fix for bug 1061 - we no longer build pass1      packages statically, therefore this explanation isn't required  <sect2>  <title>Notes on Static Linking</title>  <para>Besides their specific task, most programs have to perform many  common and sometimes trivial operations. These include allocating  memory, searching directories, reading and writing files, string  handling, pattern matching, arithmetic, and other tasks. Instead of  obliging each program to reinvent the wheel, the GNU system provides  all these basic functions in ready-made libraries. The major library  on any Linux system is Glibc.</para>  <para>There are two primary ways of linking the functions from a  library to a program that uses them—statically or dynamically. When  a program is linked statically, the code of the used functions is  included in the executable, resulting in a rather bulky program. When  a program is dynamically linked, it includes a reference to the  dynamic linker, the name of the library, and the name of the function,  resulting in a much smaller executable. A third option is to use the  programming interface of the dynamic linker (see <filename>dlopen(3)</filename>  for more information).</para>  <para>Dynamic linking is the default on Linux and has three major  advantages over static linking. First, only one copy of the executable  library code is needed on the hard disk, instead of having multiple  copies of the same code included in several programs, thus saving  disk space. Second, when several programs use the same library  function at the same time, only one copy of the function's code is  required in core, thus saving memory space. Third, when a library  function gets a bug fixed or is otherwise improved, only the one  library needs to be recompiled instead of recompiling all programs  that make use of the improved function.</para>  <para>If dynamic linking has several advantages, why then do we  statically link the first two packages in this chapter? The reasons  are threefold—historical, educational, and technical. The  historical reason is that earlier versions of LFS statically linked  every program in this chapter. Educationally, knowing the difference  between static and dynamic linking is useful. The technical benefit is  a gained element of independence from the host, meaning that those  programs can be used independently of the host system. However, it is  worth noting that an overall successful LFS build can still be  achieved when the first two packages are built dynamically.</para>  </sect2>--></sect1>
 |