toolchaintechnotes.xml 12 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218
  1. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
  2. <!DOCTYPE sect1 PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.5//EN"
  3. "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.5/docbookx.dtd" [
  4. <!ENTITY % general-entities SYSTEM "../general.ent">
  5. %general-entities;
  6. ]>
  7. <sect1 id="ch-tools-toolchaintechnotes">
  8. <?dbhtml filename="toolchaintechnotes.html"?>
  9. <title>Toolchain Technical Notes</title>
  10. <para>This section explains some of the rationale and technical details
  11. behind the overall build method. It is not essential to immediately
  12. understand everything in this section. Most of this information will be
  13. clearer after performing an actual build. This section can be referred
  14. to at any time during the process.</para>
  15. <para>The overall goal of <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> is to
  16. produce a temporary area that contains a known-good set of tools that can be
  17. isolated from the host system. By using <command>chroot</command>, the
  18. commands in the remaining chapters will be contained within that environment,
  19. ensuring a clean, trouble-free build of the target LFS system. The build
  20. process has been designed to minimize the risks for new readers and to provide
  21. the most educational value at the same time.</para>
  22. <important>
  23. <para>Before continuing, be aware of the name of the working platform,
  24. often referred to as the target triplet. A simple way to determine the
  25. name of the target triplet is to run the <command>config.guess</command>
  26. script that comes with the source for many packages. Unpack the Binutils
  27. sources and run the script: <userinput>./config.guess</userinput> and note
  28. the output. For example, for a modern 32-bit Intel processor the
  29. output will likely be <emphasis>i686-pc-linux-gnu</emphasis>.</para>
  30. <para>Also be aware of the name of the platform's dynamic linker, often
  31. referred to as the dynamic loader (not to be confused with the standard
  32. linker <command>ld</command> that is part of Binutils). The dynamic linker
  33. provided by Glibc finds and loads the shared libraries needed by a program,
  34. prepares the program to run, and then runs it. The name of the dynamic
  35. linker for a 32-bit Intel machine will be
  36. <filename class="libraryfile">ld-linux.so.2</filename>.
  37. A sure-fire way to determine the name of the dynamic linker is to
  38. inspect a random binary from the host system by running:
  39. <userinput>readelf -l &lt;name of binary&gt; | grep interpreter</userinput>
  40. and noting the output. The authoritative reference covering all platforms
  41. is in the <filename>shlib-versions</filename> file in the root of the Glibc
  42. source tree.</para>
  43. </important>
  44. <para>Some key technical points of how the <xref
  45. linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> build method works:</para>
  46. <itemizedlist>
  47. <listitem>
  48. <para>Slightly adjusting the name of the working platform, by changing the
  49. &quot;vendor&quot; field target triplet by way of the
  50. <envar>LFS_TGT</envar> variable, ensures that the first build of Binutils
  51. and GCC produces a compatible cross-linker and cross-compiler. Instead of
  52. producing binaries for another architecture, the cross-linker and
  53. cross-compiler will produce binaries compatible with the current
  54. hardware.</para>
  55. </listitem>
  56. <listitem>
  57. <para>The temporary libraries are cross-compiled. This removes all
  58. dependency on the host system, lessens the chance of headers or libraries
  59. from the host corrupting the new tools and allows for the possibility of
  60. building both 32-bit and 64-bit libraries on 64-bit capable hardware.</para>
  61. </listitem>
  62. <listitem>
  63. <para>Careful manipulation of <command>gcc</command>'s
  64. <filename>specs</filename> file tells the compiler which target dynamic
  65. linker will be used</para>
  66. </listitem>
  67. </itemizedlist>
  68. <para>Binutils is installed first because the <command>configure</command>
  69. runs of both GCC and Glibc perform various feature tests on the assembler
  70. and linker to determine which software features to enable or disable. This
  71. is more important than one might first realize. An incorrectly configured
  72. GCC or Glibc can result in a subtly broken toolchain, where the impact of
  73. such breakage might not show up until near the end of the build of an
  74. entire distribution. A test suite failure will usually highlight this error
  75. before too much additional work is performed.</para>
  76. <para>Binutils installs its assembler and linker in two locations,
  77. <filename class="directory">/tools/bin</filename> and <filename
  78. class="directory">/tools/$LFS_TGT/bin</filename>. The tools in one
  79. location are hard linked to the other. An important facet of the linker is
  80. its library search order. Detailed information can be obtained from
  81. <command>ld</command> by passing it the <parameter>--verbose</parameter>
  82. flag. For example, an <userinput>ld --verbose | grep SEARCH</userinput>
  83. will illustrate the current search paths and their order. It shows which
  84. files are linked by <command>ld</command> by compiling a dummy program and
  85. passing the <parameter>--verbose</parameter> switch to the linker. For example,
  86. <userinput>gcc dummy.c -Wl,--verbose 2&gt;&amp;1 | grep succeeded</userinput>
  87. will show all the files successfully opened during the linking.</para>
  88. <para>The next package installed is GCC. An example of what can be
  89. seen during its run of <command>configure</command> is:</para>
  90. <screen><computeroutput>checking what assembler to use... /tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/as
  91. checking what linker to use... /tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld</computeroutput></screen>
  92. <para>This is important for the reasons mentioned above. It also demonstrates
  93. that GCC's configure script does not search the PATH directories to find which
  94. tools to use. However, during the actual operation of <command>gcc</command>
  95. itself, the same search paths are not necessarily used. To find out which
  96. standard linker <command>gcc</command> will use, run:
  97. <userinput>gcc -print-prog-name=ld</userinput>.</para>
  98. <para>Detailed information can be obtained from <command>gcc</command> by
  99. passing it the <parameter>-v</parameter> command line option while compiling
  100. a dummy program. For example, <userinput>gcc -v dummy.c</userinput> will show
  101. detailed information about the preprocessor, compilation, and assembly stages,
  102. including <command>gcc</command>'s included search paths and their order.</para>
  103. <para>The next package installed is Glibc. The most important considerations
  104. for building Glibc are the compiler, binary tools, and kernel headers. The
  105. compiler is generally not an issue since Glibc will always use the compiler
  106. relating to the <parameter>--host</parameter> parameter passed to its
  107. configure script, e.g. in our case,
  108. <command>i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc</command>. The binary tools and kernel
  109. headers can be a bit more complicated. Therefore, take no risks and use the
  110. available configure switches to enforce the correct selections. After the run
  111. of <command>configure</command>, check the contents of the
  112. <filename>config.make</filename> file in the <filename
  113. class="directory">glibc-build</filename> directory for all important details.
  114. Note the use of <parameter>CC="i686-lfs-gnu-gcc"</parameter> to control which
  115. binary tools are used and the use of the <parameter>-nostdinc</parameter> and
  116. <parameter>-isystem</parameter> flags to control the compiler's include
  117. search path. These items highlight an important aspect of the Glibc
  118. package&mdash;it is very self-sufficient in terms of its build machinery and
  119. generally does not rely on toolchain defaults.</para>
  120. <para>After the Glibc installation, change <command>gcc</command>'s specs file
  121. to point to the new dynamic linker in <filename
  122. class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>. This last step is vital in ensuring
  123. that searching and linking take place only within the <filename
  124. class="directory">/tools</filename> prefix. A hard-wired
  125. path to a dynamic linker is embedded into every Executable and Link Format
  126. (ELF)-shared executable. This can be inspected by running:
  127. <userinput>readelf -l &lt;name of binary&gt; | grep interpreter</userinput>.
  128. Amending <command>gcc</command>'s specs file ensures that every program
  129. compiled from here through the end of this chapter will use the new dynamic
  130. linker in <filename class="directory">/tools/lib</filename>.</para>
  131. <para>For the second pass of GCC, its sources also need to be modified
  132. to tell GCC to use the new dynamic linker. Failure to do
  133. so will result in the GCC programs themselves having the name of the
  134. dynamic linker from the host system's <filename
  135. class="directory">/lib</filename> directory embedded into them, which
  136. would defeat the goal of getting away from the host.</para>
  137. <para>During the second pass of Binutils, we are able to utilize the
  138. <parameter>--with-lib-path</parameter> configure switch to control
  139. <command>ld</command>'s library search path. From this point onwards,
  140. the core toolchain is self-contained and self-hosted. The remainder of
  141. the <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> packages all build against
  142. the new Glibc in <filename class="directory">/tools</filename>.</para>
  143. <para>Upon entering the chroot environment in <xref
  144. linkend="chapter-building-system"/>, the first major package to be
  145. installed is Glibc, due to its self-sufficient nature mentioned above.
  146. Once this Glibc is installed into <filename
  147. class="directory">/usr</filename>, we will perform a quick changeover of the
  148. toolchain defaults, and then proceed in building the rest of the target
  149. LFS system.</para>
  150. <!-- FIXME: Removed as part of the fix for bug 1061 - we no longer build pass1
  151. packages statically, therefore this explanation isn't required
  152. <sect2>
  153. <title>Notes on Static Linking</title>
  154. <para>Besides their specific task, most programs have to perform many
  155. common and sometimes trivial operations. These include allocating
  156. memory, searching directories, reading and writing files, string
  157. handling, pattern matching, arithmetic, and other tasks. Instead of
  158. obliging each program to reinvent the wheel, the GNU system provides
  159. all these basic functions in ready-made libraries. The major library
  160. on any Linux system is Glibc.</para>
  161. <para>There are two primary ways of linking the functions from a
  162. library to a program that uses them&mdash;statically or dynamically. When
  163. a program is linked statically, the code of the used functions is
  164. included in the executable, resulting in a rather bulky program. When
  165. a program is dynamically linked, it includes a reference to the
  166. dynamic linker, the name of the library, and the name of the function,
  167. resulting in a much smaller executable. A third option is to use the
  168. programming interface of the dynamic linker (see <filename>dlopen(3)</filename>
  169. for more information).</para>
  170. <para>Dynamic linking is the default on Linux and has three major
  171. advantages over static linking. First, only one copy of the executable
  172. library code is needed on the hard disk, instead of having multiple
  173. copies of the same code included in several programs, thus saving
  174. disk space. Second, when several programs use the same library
  175. function at the same time, only one copy of the function's code is
  176. required in core, thus saving memory space. Third, when a library
  177. function gets a bug fixed or is otherwise improved, only the one
  178. library needs to be recompiled instead of recompiling all programs
  179. that make use of the improved function.</para>
  180. <para>If dynamic linking has several advantages, why then do we
  181. statically link the first two packages in this chapter? The reasons
  182. are threefold&mdash;historical, educational, and technical. The
  183. historical reason is that earlier versions of LFS statically linked
  184. every program in this chapter. Educationally, knowing the difference
  185. between static and dynamic linking is useful. The technical benefit is
  186. a gained element of independence from the host, meaning that those
  187. programs can be used independently of the host system. However, it is
  188. worth noting that an overall successful LFS build can still be
  189. achieved when the first two packages are built dynamically.</para>
  190. </sect2>-->
  191. </sect1>