|  | @@ -1,32 +1,27 @@
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  <sect1 id="pre-whoread">
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  <title>Who would want to read this book</title>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -<para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -There are a lot of reasons why somebody would want to read this book in
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -order to install an LFS system. The question most people raise is "why 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -go through all the hassle of manually installing a Linux system from 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -scratch when you can just download an existing version like Debian or 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -Redhat". That is a valid question which I hope to answer for you.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -</para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -<para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -The most important reason for LFS's existence is teaching people how a
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -Linux system works internally. Building an LFS system teaches you about
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -all that makes Linux tick, how things work together, and depend on each
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -other. And most importantly, how to customize it to your own taste and
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -needs.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -</para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -<para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -One of the key benefits of LFS is that you are in control over your
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -system without having to rely on somebody else's Linux implementation
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -like Debian. You are in the driver's seat now and are able to dictate
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -every single thing such as the directory layout and boot script setup.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -You will also know exactly where, why and how programs are installed.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -</para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -<para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -Another benefit of LFS is that you can create a very compact Linux
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +<para>There are a lot of reasons why somebody would want to read this 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +book in order to install an LFS system. The question most people raise 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +is "why go through all the hassle of manually installing a Linux system 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +from scratch when you can just download an existing version like Debian 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +or Redhat". That is a valid question which I hope to answer for 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +you.</para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +<para>The most important reason for LFS's existence is teaching people 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +how a Linux system works internally. Building an LFS system teaches you 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +about all that makes Linux tick, how things work together, and depend on 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +each other. And most importantly, how to customize it to your own taste 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +and needs.</para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +<para>One of the key benefits of LFS is that you are in control over 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +your system without having to rely on somebody else's Linux 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +implementation like Debian. You are in the driver's seat now and are 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +able to dictate every single thing such as the directory layout and boot 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +script setup. You will also know exactly where, why and how programs 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +are installed.</para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +<para>Another benefit of LFS is that you can create a very compact Linux
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  system. When you install a distribution like Debian or RedHat, you end
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  up installing a lot of programs you would never in your life use.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  They're just sitting there taking up (precious) disk space. It's not
 | 
	
	
		
			
				|  | @@ -35,37 +30,31 @@ like a lot? A few of us have been working on creating a very small
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  embedded LFS system. We installed a system that was just enough to run
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  the Apache web server; total disk space usage was aproximately 8 MB.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  With further stripping, that can be brought down to 5 MB or less. Try
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -that with a generic Debian or Redhat distribution.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -</para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -<para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -If we were to compare a Linux distribution with a hamburger you buy at a
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -supermarket or fast-food restaurant, you would end up eating it without
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -knowing precisely what it is you are eating, whereas LFS gives you the
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -ingredients to make a hamburger. This allows you to carefully inspect
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -it, remove unwanted ingredients, and at the same time allow you to add
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -ingredients to enhance the flavour of your hamburger. When you are
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +that with a generic Debian or Redhat distribution.</para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +<para>If we were to compare a Linux distribution with a hamburger you 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +buy at a supermarket or fast-food restaurant, you would end up eating it 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +without knowing precisely what it is you are eating, whereas LFS gives 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +you the ingredients to make a hamburger. This allows you to carefully 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +inspect it, remove unwanted ingredients, and at the same time allow you 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +to add ingredients to enhance the flavour of your hamburger. When you are
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  satisfied with the ingredients, you go on to the next part of putting it
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  together. You now have the chance to make it just the way you like it:
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -broil it, bake it, deep-fry it, barbeque it, or eat it raw.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -</para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +broil it, bake it, deep-fry it, barbeque it, or eat it raw.</para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -<para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -Another analogy that we can use is that of comparing LFS with a finished
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -house. LFS will give you the skeleton of a house, but it's up to you to
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -install plumbing, electrical outlets, kitchen, bathtub, wallpaper, etc.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -</para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +<para>Another analogy that we can use is that of comparing LFS with a 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +finished house. LFS will give you the skeleton of a house, but it's up 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +to you to install plumbing, electrical outlets, kitchen, bathtub, 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +wallpaper, etc.</para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -<para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -Another advantage of a custom built Linux system is added security. You
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -will compile the entire system from source, thus allowing you to audit
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +<para>Another advantage of a custom built Linux system is added security. 
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +You will compile the entire system from source, thus allowing you to audit
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  everything, if you wish to do so, and apply all the security patches you
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  want or need to apply. You don't have to wait for somebody else to
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  provide a new binary package that fixes a security hole. Besides, you
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  have no guarantee that the new package actually fixes the problem
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  (adequately). You never truly know whether a security hole is fixed or
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -not unless you do it yourself.
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | -</para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  | +not unless you do it yourself.</para>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  </sect1>
 | 
	
		
			
				|  |  |  
 |