|
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ current GCC-3.3.1 should look on i686-pc-linux-gnu, see
|
|
<para>Note that the results contain:</para>
|
|
<para>Note that the results contain:</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<screen>* 1 XPASS (unexpected pass) for g++
|
|
<screen>* 1 XPASS (unexpected pass) for g++
|
|
-* 1 FAIL for g++
|
|
|
|
|
|
+* 1 FAIL (unexpected failure) for g++
|
|
* 2 FAIL for gcc
|
|
* 2 FAIL for gcc
|
|
* 26 XPASS's for libstdc++</screen>
|
|
* 26 XPASS's for libstdc++</screen>
|
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -148,6 +148,11 @@ model (which may be applicable if for instance you were using Newlibc, Sun-libc
|
|
or whatever libc). The libstdc++ test suite is apparently expecting the
|
|
or whatever libc). The libstdc++ test suite is apparently expecting the
|
|
"generic" model, hence those tests are not always expected to pass.</para>
|
|
"generic" model, hence those tests are not always expected to pass.</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+<para>Unexpected failures often cannot be avoided. The GCC developers are
|
|
|
|
+usually aware of them but haven't yet gotten around to fixing them. In short,
|
|
|
|
+unless your results are vastly different from those at the above URL, it is safe
|
|
|
|
+to continue on.</para>
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
<para>And finally install the package:</para>
|
|
<para>And finally install the package:</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para><screen><userinput>make install</userinput></screen></para>
|
|
<para><screen><userinput>make install</userinput></screen></para>
|