|
@@ -3,36 +3,21 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
|
Most programs and libraries by default are compiled with debugging
|
|
|
-symbols and optimizing level 2 (gcc options -g and -O2) and are compiled
|
|
|
-for a specific CPU. On Intel platforms software is compiled for i386
|
|
|
-processors by default. If a user doesn't wish to run software on other
|
|
|
-machines other than his own, he might want to change the default
|
|
|
-compiler options so that they will be compiled with a higher
|
|
|
-optimization level, no debugging symbols and generate code for his
|
|
|
-specific architecture. Let me first explain what debugging symbols
|
|
|
-are.
|
|
|
+symbols (gcc option -g) Let me explain what these debugging symbols
|
|
|
+are and why you may not want them.
|
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
|
A program compiled with debugging symbols means a user can run a program or
|
|
|
-library through a debugger and the debugger's output will be user friendlier.
|
|
|
-These debugging symbols also enlarge the program or library significantly.
|
|
|
+library through a debugger and the debugger's output will be user
|
|
|
+friendly. These debugging symbols also enlarge the program or library
|
|
|
+significantly.
|
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
|
-To remove debugging symbols from a binary (must be an a.out or ELF binary)
|
|
|
-run <userinput>strip --strip-debug filename</userinput>. A user can use wild
|
|
|
- cards
|
|
|
-if he needs to strip debugging symbols from multiple files (use something like
|
|
|
-strip --strip-debug $LFS/usr/bin/*). Another, easier, options is just
|
|
|
-not to compile programs with debugging symbols. Most people will probably
|
|
|
-never use a debugger on software, so by leaving those symbols out
|
|
|
-a lot of diskspace can be saved.
|
|
|
-</para>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-<para>
|
|
|
-Before someone wonders if these debugging symbols would make a big difference,
|
|
|
-here are some statistics:
|
|
|
+Before you start wondering whether these debugging symbols really make a
|
|
|
+big difference, here are some statistics. Use them to draw your own
|
|
|
+conclusion.
|
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<itemizedlist>
|
|
@@ -58,12 +43,20 @@ here are some statistics:
|
|
|
</itemizedlist>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
|
-Sizes may vary depending on which compiler was used and which C library
|
|
|
+Sizes vary depending on which compiler was used and which C library
|
|
|
version was used to link dynamic programs against, but results will be
|
|
|
-similar if a user compares programs with and without debugging symbols. After
|
|
|
+similar if you compare programs with and without debugging symbols. After
|
|
|
I was done with this chapter and stripped all debugging symbols from all LFS
|
|
|
-binaries and libraries I regained a little over 102 MB of disk space. Quite
|
|
|
-the difference.
|
|
|
+binaries I regained a little over 102 MB of disk space. Quite the difference.
|
|
|
+</para>
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+<para>
|
|
|
+To remove debugging symbols from a binary (must be an a.out or ELF
|
|
|
+binary) run <userinput>strip --strip-debug filename</userinput>. Wild cards
|
|
|
+can be used to strip debugging symbols from multiple files (use something
|
|
|
+like <userinput>strip --strip-debug $LFS/usr/bin/*</userinput>).
|
|
|
+Most people will probably never use a debugger on software, so by
|
|
|
+removing those symbols a lot of diskspace can be regained.
|
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</sect1>
|