|
@@ -72,8 +72,9 @@ current GCC-3.3.1 should look on i686-pc-linux-gnu, see
|
|
<para>Note that the results contain:</para>
|
|
<para>Note that the results contain:</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<screen>* 1 XPASS (unexpected pass) for g++
|
|
<screen>* 1 XPASS (unexpected pass) for g++
|
|
-* 26 XPASS's for libstdc++
|
|
|
|
-* 1 FAIL for libstdc++</screen>
|
|
|
|
|
|
+* 1 FAIL for g++
|
|
|
|
+* 2 FAIL for gcc
|
|
|
|
+* 26 XPASS's for libstdc++</screen>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>The unexpected pass for g++ is due to the use of
|
|
<para>The unexpected pass for g++ is due to the use of
|
|
<userinput>--enable-__cxa_atexit</userinput>. Apparently not all platforms
|
|
<userinput>--enable-__cxa_atexit</userinput>. Apparently not all platforms
|
|
@@ -88,11 +89,6 @@ model (which may be applicable if for instance you were using Newlibc, Sun-libc
|
|
or whatever libc). The libstdc++ test suite is apparently expecting the
|
|
or whatever libc). The libstdc++ test suite is apparently expecting the
|
|
"generic" model, hence those tests are not always expected to pass.</para>
|
|
"generic" model, hence those tests are not always expected to pass.</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
-<para>The failure for libstdc++ is in
|
|
|
|
-<filename>26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc</filename> and is a
|
|
|
|
-long-standing known failure (since at least January 2002) that the developers
|
|
|
|
-are apparently unable to easily fix.</para>
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
<para>And finally install the package:</para>
|
|
<para>And finally install the package:</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para><screen><userinput>make install</userinput></screen></para>
|
|
<para><screen><userinput>make install</userinput></screen></para>
|